1.
e4
c5
2.
Nf3
Nc6
3.
d4
cxd4
4.
Nxd4
Nf6
5.
Nc3
d6
6.
Be3
g6
7.
Be2
Bg7
8.
O-O
Bd7
9.
a3
O-O
10.
Qd2
Rc8
11.
h3
Ne5
12.
Rfe1
Nc4
13.
Bxc4
Rxc4
14.
Rad1
a6
15.
Qd3
Rc8
16.
Bg5
h6
17.
Bc1
b5
18.
Nd5
Ne8
19.
c3
e6
20.
Nb4
Qb6
21.
Be3
Qb7
22.
Qd2
Kh7
23.
Nf3
a5
24.
Nc2
Bc6
25.
Bf4
Bxe4
26.
Qe2
Bxf3
27.
Qxf3
Qxf3
28.
gxf3
d5
29.
Nd4
Bxd4
30.
Rxd4
a4
31.
Rb4
Rc4
32.
Rc1
Ng7
33.
Be5
f6
34.
Bd6
Rxb4
35.
cxb4
Rf7
36.
Rc8
Nf5
37.
Bc5
Rb7
38.
Rc6
Ng7
39.
Bf8
e5
40.
Rxf6
Nf5
41.
Bd6
Rb6
42.
Bxe5
Rxf6
43.
Bxf6
Kg8
44.
Kf1
Kf7
45.
Be5
Ke6
46.
f4
Ne7
47.
Ke2
Nc6
48.
Bg7
h5
49.
Kd3
Ne7
50.
Bh6
Nf5
51.
Bg5
Kd6
52.
Bf6
Kc6
53.
Be5
Nh4
54.
Ke2
Kd7
55.
Bf6
Nf5
56.
Kd3
Ke6
57.
Bg5
Kd6
58.
Bf6
Kd7
59.
Bg5
Ke6
60.
Bd8
Nd6
61.
Bg5
Nc4
62.
Kc3
Kf5
63.
f3
Ke6
64.
h4
Ne3
65.
Kd3
Nc4
66.
Kc3
Kf5
67.
Bh6
Ne3
68.
Kd4
Nc4
69.
Kxd5
Nxb2
70.
Kc5
Nc4
71.
Kxb5
Nxa3+
72.
Kxa4
Nc4
73.
b5
Ke6
74.
Kb4
Nd6
75.
Kc5
Kd7
76.
Kb6
Kc8
77.
Kc6
Nf5
78.
Bg5
Nd4+
79.
Kb6
Nxf3
80.
Ka7
Nd4
81.
b6
Nc6+
82.
Ka8
Na5
83.
Be7
Nb7
84.
Bb4
Nd8
85.
Bd6
Nb7
86.
Bc7
Na5
87.
Ka7
Nb7
88.
Ka6
Nc5+
89.
Kb5
Ne6
90.
Kc6
Nd4+
91.
Kd6
Nf5+
92.
Kd5
Ne7+
93.
Kd6
Nf5+
94.
Kc5
Kb7
95.
Bd8
Kc8
96.
Bg5
Kb7
97.
Bd8
Kc8
98.
Bf6
Kb7
99.
Bg5
Ng3
100.
Bd8
Nf5
101.
Bg5
Ng3
102.
Bd8
Nf5
103.
Bf6
Ng3
104.
Bd8
Nf5
105.
Bg5
Ng7
106.
Kd5
Kxb6
107.
Ke5
Kc6
108.
Kf6
Nf5
109.
Kxg6
Ng3
110.
f5
Kd7
111.
f6
Ke8
112.
f7+
Kf8
113.
Bh6+
1-0
Opening Explorer
Explorer is loading.
Site
New York
Date
1889.??.??
White
Baird, David Graham
Black
Weiss, Miksa
Result
1-0
Score
Game No. 47 in Wilhelm Steinitz’s The Book of the Sixth American Chess Congress (1891), printed pages 62–65; played 1889.05.25. The original descriptive notation and printed analysis are retained.
- 5…d6 This move, in conjunction with the next, has come into fashion of late, having been introduced in the Frankfort Tournament by Louis Paulsen. It is a line of play that cannot be easily demonstrated as disadvantageous for the second player, yet we think that the entrance which White obtains for his pieces at Q5 should give the first player the superior game, as Black must sooner or later play P — K3, and thus weaken his QP.
- 7.Be2 Instead of which we would recommend 7 Kt — Q5, which, we believe, was first proposed in the Deutsche Schachzeitung. White then threatens Kt — Kt 5, and if 7. . .P— K3 (or 7. . .P— QR3; 8 KtxQKt, 8 PxKt; 9 B— Kt6, and wins); 8 KtxKtch., 8QxKt; 9 Kt— Kt5, 9Q— Qsq.; 10 QB— KB4, 10 P— K4; 11 B — K3, with much the superior game.
- 9.a3 We see no use for this.
- 11.h3 Not as good as P— KB3.
- 16.Bg5 Also useless, unless he intended to exchange the adverse Knight, followed by Kt— Q5.
- 17…b5 We do not approve of this advance, which, as will be seen, subjects him to a strong attack on his Q side.
- 22.Qd2 White has obtained the better game but practically abandons his advantage with this and the next move. Kt—Kt3, followed by B — Q4 or B — B4, was the proper play.
- 23…a5 With this and the following move Black forces the gain of a Pawn, with an excellent game.
- 29…Bxd4 An ill-advised and premature exchange. After R — B5 instead (whereupon, of course, White could not capture the Kt P without losing the Bishop), followed by P—QKt5, Black had it all his own way.
- 30…a4 This becomes now necessary, for White threatens P — QR4, which would soon win both Pawns on the Q side; and if 30...R—B5, then still 31 P— QR4, and then if 31.. .RxR; 32 PxR, followed accordingly by R — R sq. in reply to P X P, or by R— QB sq. in answer to P — Kt 5, in each case with the superior game. Or, if 31...R x P; 32 R x R, followed by R— R.sq. ; or, if 31 . . . P x P; 32 Rx R, followed by R— K4.
- 33.Be5 White’s last three moves are each very finely conceived, and are evidently in accordance with his general plan of attack, which he has managed very cleverly to wrest from his opponent, albeit the latter is a Pawn ahead and has a Knight against a Bishop, with a compact position of Pawns, whilst White’s Pawns are broken up. With the excellent move in the text he deliberately provokes the advance of the hostile BP in order to gain time, as will be seen.
- 34…Rxb4 If R — Q sq., White answers, of course, B — K7, winning a Pawn, and this contingency was clearly aimed at by White's 33d move. We, however, would have preferred that line of play, followed by R — QKt sq. , which would have secured the draw more easily than giving the opponent an open file for his Rook by the exchange in the text.
- 39.Bf8 All very well played by White.
- 39…e5 A more simple and sure draw could have been effected, we believe, by 39 K—Kt sq.; 40 B x Kt, 40 K x B; 41 R x P, 41 R—QB2; 42 R—Q6, 42 R—B7; 43 R x P, 43 R x KtP; 44 R x P, 44 R—Kt6, followed by R x RP.
- 41…Rb6 Best, apparently. If 41 . . . P— K5; 42 P x P, 42 P x P; 43 B— B5, 43 R— Q2; 44 R— QKt 6, etc. Or, if 41 . . . Kt x B; 42 R x Kt, 42 P— Q5; 43 R— Q5, 43 K— Kt 2; 44 R X KP, 44 R—Q2; 45 K— B sq., and should win.
- 67…Ne3 This is one of those positions which is generally lost by the party that first attempts to win. The manoeuvring on both sides had made no impression, and Black could easily draw, either by alternating the move of the King or that of the Knight, provided that he either kept the QP defended or was ready at once to capture the KtP in case the adverse King moved away. But he has allowed himself now incautiously to be trapped into a losing position.
- 68.Kd4 Taking advantage of the adverse error with great precision.
- 73.b5 But here White again gives his opponent a reprieve. K — Kt5 would have decided the victory completely, for wherever Black played the Knight, K — B6 would win easily.
- 76.Kb6 Again P — Kt 6, followed by K — Q5, with the view of crossing over to the K side, would win.
- 79.Kb6 K — Q5 wins in a similar manner, no matter which Pawn Black takes.
- 104…Nf5 The repetition seems to have been made under pressure of time limit.
- 105…Ng7 This helps the adversary to see his way clear, for White obviously gains a move now in playing the King to the other side, as he will attack Pawn and Knight simultaneously. But White could have won without that previously, and at present if he had only hit on the idea of abandoning the KtP. For, supposing 105. . .Kt— Kt6; 106 K— Q5, 106 K x P; 107 K— K6, 107 K—B3; 108 K— B6, 108K— Q3; 109 KxP, 109 K—K3; 110 B—Q8, 110 K—Q2; 111 B— R5, 111 K— K3; 112 B— K sq., and wins.
- 106.Kd5 He sees it at last, and the rest is obvious.
[Event "USA-06 Congress Grand Tournament"] [Site "New York"] [Date "1889.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Baird, David Graham"] [Black "Weiss, Miksa"] [Result "1-0"] 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Be3 g6 7. Be2 Bg7 8. O-O Bd7 9. a3 O-O 10. Qd2 Rc8 11. h3 Ne5 12. Rfe1 Nc4 13. Bxc4 Rxc4 14. Rad1 a6 15. Qd3 Rc8 16. Bg5 h6 17. Bc1 b5 18. Nd5 Ne8 19. c3 e6 20. Nb4 Qb6 21. Be3 Qb7 22. Qd2 Kh7 23. Nf3 a5 24. Nc2 Bc6 25. Bf4 Bxe4 26. Qe2 Bxf3 27. Qxf3 Qxf3 28. gxf3 d5 29. Nd4 Bxd4 30. Rxd4 a4 31. Rb4 Rc4 32. Rc1 Ng7 33. Be5 f6 34. Bd6 Rxb4 35. cxb4 Rf7 36. Rc8 Nf5 37. Bc5 Rb7 38. Rc6 Ng7 39. Bf8 e5 40. Rxf6 Nf5 41. Bd6 Rb6 42. Bxe5 Rxf6 43. Bxf6 Kg8 44. Kf1 Kf7 45. Be5 Ke6 46. f4 Ne7 47. Ke2 Nc6 48. Bg7 h5 49. Kd3 Ne7 50. Bh6 Nf5 51. Bg5 Kd6 52. Bf6 Kc6 53. Be5 Nh4 54. Ke2 Kd7 55. Bf6 Nf5 56. Kd3 Ke6 57. Bg5 Kd6 58. Bf6 Kd7 59. Bg5 Ke6 60. Bd8 Nd6 61. Bg5 Nc4 62. Kc3 Kf5 63. f3 Ke6 64. h4 Ne3 65. Kd3 Nc4 66. Kc3 Kf5 67. Bh6 Ne3 68. Kd4 Nc4 69. Kxd5 Nxb2 70. Kc5 Nc4 71. Kxb5 Nxa3+ 72. Kxa4 Nc4 73. b5 Ke6 74. Kb4 Nd6 75. Kc5 Kd7 76. Kb6 Kc8 77. Kc6 Nf5 78. Bg5 Nd4+ 79. Kb6 Nxf3 80. Ka7 Nd4 81. b6 Nc6+ 82. Ka8 Na5 83. Be7 Nb7 84. Bb4 Nd8 85. Bd6 Nb7 86. Bc7 Na5 87. Ka7 Nb7 88. Ka6 Nc5+ 89. Kb5 Ne6 90. Kc6 Nd4+ 91. Kd6 Nf5+ 92. Kd5 Ne7+ 93. Kd6 Nf5+ 94. Kc5 Kb7 95. Bd8 Kc8 96. Bg5 Kb7 97. Bd8 Kc8 98. Bf6 Kb7 99. Bg5 Ng3 100. Bd8 Nf5 101. Bg5 Ng3 102. Bd8 Nf5 103. Bf6 Ng3 104. Bd8 Nf5 105. Bg5 Ng7 106. Kd5 Kxb6 107. Ke5 Kc6 108. Kf6 Nf5 109. Kxg6 Ng3 110. f5 Kd7 111. f6 Ke8 112. f7+ Kf8 113. Bh6+ 1-0