Game 225 in Wilhelm Steinitz’s The Book of the Sixth American Chess Congress (1891), printed page 290. Played in the second round at New York on May 3, 1889. The original notes retain descriptive notation.

1. 5…Nf6 5...Kt—Q3 is, as usual in similar positions, the best defence. He might have been greatly hampered in his development after the inferior move in the text.
2. 8.d4 For now White might have more effectively carried out the idea of an attack which the editor introduced in a kindred position in his last match with the late Mr. Zukertort, the positions being alike with the exception that Zukertort had played 5...Kt—Q3, namely: 8 Q—K2 (threatening Kt x QBP if Black answer O—O), 8...B—K3; 9 P—Q3, and again Black cannot Castle on account of the reply Kt x KBP. It will now be seen that for the purposes of defence in this variation Black’s Knight is better posted at Q3 than at KB3, for in the former case Black would at this point gain time by Kt—KB4, threatening Kt—Q5, whereas, in the present position, if Black play 9...Kt—Q4, White obviously answers P—QB4.
3. 11…Ng4 P—B3, with the view of playing Q—Kt3, followed by QR—Q sq., or else of entering in the centre by Kt—Q4, would have better maintained Black’s slight superiority on account of his two Bishops.
4. 16…f6 He had to guard against B x KtP, but R— K sq. served the same object and was better.
5. 21…Rd8 Indirectly providing against P — QB4, to which Black would now reply B X QBP.
6. 34.Rd2 Both parties play cautiously and well, and a draw results from the nature of the position.