1.
e4
e5
2.
f4
Bc5
3.
Nf3
Nc6
4.
fxe5
d5
5.
exd5
Qxd5
6.
Nc3
Qd8
7.
Ne4
Bb6
8.
c3
Bg4
9.
d4
Qd5
10.
Nf2
Nxe5
11.
Qe2
Bxf3
12.
gxf3
Qxf3
13.
Qxe5+
Kf8
14.
Be2
Qc6
15.
Rg1
f6
16.
Qg3
g6
17.
Be3
Re8
18.
Kd2
Ne7
19.
Bd3
Qd7
20.
Ng4
Nd5
21.
Rae1
Nxe3
22.
Rxe3
Qf7
23.
Nxf6
Rxe3
24.
Qxe3
Qxa2
1-0
Opening Explorer
Explorer is loading.
Event
British CA-02 Morphy blindfd sim +6-1=1
Site
Birmingham
Date
1858.08.27
White
Black
Rhodes, John
Result
1-0
Score
Board 5 of the Birmingham blindfold display; a King's Gambit declined by Mr. Rhodes.
- 4.fxe5 We consider B. to Q. Kt's 5th also to be a good move at this juncture.
- 4…d5 The sacrifice of the Knight here is not advisable, as the variation we append will prove:— 4. Kt. takes P.; 5. Kt. takes Kt., Q. to R's 5th (ch.); 6. P. to Kt's 3rd, Q. takes K's P. (ch.); 7. Q. to K's 2nd, Q. takes R.; 8. P. to Q's 4th, B. to K's 2nd; 9. Kt. to K. B's 3rd, P. to Q's 3rd; 10. B. to K's 3rd, B. to Kt's 5th; 11. Q. Kt. to Q's 2nd, and we prefer the position of the first player.
- 11.Qe2 From the diagram above it will be noticed that if White had taken the Knight with Pawn, Black would have answered with B. takes Kt. (ch.), &c., and obtained at least a safe, even game.
- 13…Kf8 When Mr. Rhodes sacrificed the piece, he no doubt thought that after moving his King to Bishop's sq., he should be enabled to bring his Q. R. to K's sq. with great effect, or he would scarcely have dared to give up so much to so formidable an opponent.
- 24…Qxa2 White now gave mate in three moves, the conclusion running 25. Q. to K's 8th (ch.), K. to Kt's 2nd, &c.
[Event "British CA-02 Morphy blindfd sim +6-1=1"] [Site "Birmingham"] [Date "1858.08.27"] [Round "?"] [White "Morphy, Paul"] [Black "Rhodes, John"] [Result "1-0"] 1. e4 e5 2. f4 Bc5 3. Nf3 Nc6 4. fxe5 d5 5. exd5 Qxd5 6. Nc3 Qd8 7. Ne4 Bb6 8. c3 Bg4 9. d4 Qd5 10. Nf2 Nxe5 11. Qe2 Bxf3 12. gxf3 Qxf3 13. Qxe5+ Kf8 14. Be2 Qc6 15. Rg1 f6 16. Qg3 g6 17. Be3 Re8 18. Kd2 Ne7 19. Bd3 Qd7 20. Ng4 Nd5 21. Rae1 Nxe3 22. Rxe3 Qf7 23. Nxf6 Rxe3 24. Qxe3 Qxa2 1-0