1.
e4
e5
2.
Nc3
Nc6
3.
Nf3
Nf6
4.
Bb5
Bb4
5.
O-O
O-O
6.
Bxc6
bxc6
7.
d3
d6
8.
Ne2
Ne8
9.
Ng3
c5
10.
c3
Ba5
11.
Bg5
f6
12.
Be3
Rb8
13.
Qe2
c6
14.
Rad1
Nc7
15.
Ne1
Ne6
16.
f4
exf4
17.
Bxf4
Nxf4
18.
Rxf4
Be6
19.
Rf2
Rf7
20.
c4
Rfb7
21.
b3
Bc3
22.
Nf3
Bg4
23.
h3
Bxf3
24.
Rxf3
g6
25.
Qc2
Be5
26.
Ne2
Re7
27.
Kh1
Qb6
28.
Qd2
Rbe8
29.
b4
Rb8
30.
bxc5
dxc5
31.
g4
Qd8
32.
Nc3
Reb7
33.
Rc1
Rb2
34.
Rc2
Rxc2
35.
Qxc2
Qa5
36.
Nd1
Qe1+
37.
Kg2
h5
38.
Rf2
hxg4
39.
hxg4
Bd4
40.
Rf1
Qh4
41.
Qe2
Kg7
42.
Rh1
Qg5
43.
Kf3
Be5
44.
Qe3
Qxe3+
45.
Nxe3
Rb2
46.
Ng2
Rxa2
47.
Nf4
Bxf4
48.
Kxf4
a5
49.
Rb1
a4
50.
Rb6
a3
51.
Rxc6
Ra1
52.
e5
Rf1+
53.
Ke4
a2
54.
Rc7+
Kf8
55.
Ra7
f5+
56.
gxf5
gxf5+
57.
Kd5
a1=Q
58.
Rxa1
Rxa1
59.
Kxc5
f4
60.
d4
f3
61.
d5
f2
62.
d6
f1=Q
0-1
Opening Explorer
Explorer is loading.
Site
New York
Date
1889.??.??
Round
26
White
Taubenhaus, Jean
Black
Burn, Amos
Result
0-1
Score
Game 195 in Wilhelm Steinitz’s The Book of the Sixth American Chess Congress (1891), printed pages 251–252. Played in the second round at New York on April 26, 1889. The original notes retain descriptive notation.
- 6…bxc6 Pursuant to general principles, it is mostly better to capture toward the centre.
- 8…Ne8 8 P — QB4 was much preferable.
- 9.Ng3 For now White might have obtained a very good game by 9 P—B3, 9 B—QB4 (if 9...B—R4; 10 Q—R4, winning a Pawn); 10 P—Q4, etc.
- 19…Rf7 Black dare not capture the RP on account of the rejoinder P — QKt4.
- 21…Bc3 Black has skilfully forced the advance of the adverse Pawns on the Q side for the purpose of gaining entrance for this Bishop which keeps command of the hostile weakened centre.
- 26…Re7 Q—Kt3 was preferable, and Black’s best plan was afterward to try forcing an opening by the advance of the QRP.
- 27.Kh1 We think that White could have extricated himself, with an even game, by P— Q4.
- 29.b4 As Black dare not capture this Pawn on pain of losing a piece, this move practically only gives the opponent command of an open QKt file, which White cannot keep closed for long. P—Q4 was even now good for a draw, we believe.
- 31.g4 Weak, and the source of trouble on the K side.
- 33…Rb2 33...Q—R4 was stronger and likely to lead to the following continuation: 34 Kt—Kt sq., 34 Q—R5; 35 Kt—B3, 35 Q—Kt5; 36 Kt—Kt sq., 36 Q x Kt; 37 R x Q, 37 R x R ch.; 38 K—Kt2, 38 QR—Kt7, and wins.
- 43.Kf3 White defends himself very ingeniously, but his game is too much broken up on both wings.
- 43…Be5 R—Kt8 was likely to lead to a successful attack without exchanging heavy pieces, but, of course, this is good enough, as it wins a Pawn.
- 47.Nf4 The reduction of his forces weakens his defence, but he could not make much use of his Knight anyhow. If 47 Kt—K3, 47 R—Q7; 48 R—Q sq., 48 R x R; 49 Kt x R, 49 B—Q5, and wins.
- 51.Rxc6 No better was 51 R—R6, 51 R—R8; 52 K—Kt3 (or 52 K—K3, 52 P—R7; 53 K—Q2, 53 R—KR8, and wins), 52...P—R7; 53 K—Kt2, 53 K—Kt4, and wins. It will be seen from this variation, as well as from actual play, that Black had well calculated his end play up to the winning point.
[Event "USA-06 Congress Grand Tournament"] [Site "New York"] [Date "1889.??.??"] [Round "26"] [White "Taubenhaus, Jean"] [Black "Burn, Amos"] [Result "0-1"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. Bb5 Bb4 5. O-O O-O 6. Bxc6 bxc6 7. d3 d6 8. Ne2 Ne8 9. Ng3 c5 10. c3 Ba5 11. Bg5 f6 12. Be3 Rb8 13. Qe2 c6 14. Rad1 Nc7 15. Ne1 Ne6 16. f4 exf4 17. Bxf4 Nxf4 18. Rxf4 Be6 19. Rf2 Rf7 20. c4 Rfb7 21. b3 Bc3 22. Nf3 Bg4 23. h3 Bxf3 24. Rxf3 g6 25. Qc2 Be5 26. Ne2 Re7 27. Kh1 Qb6 28. Qd2 Rbe8 29. b4 Rb8 30. bxc5 dxc5 31. g4 Qd8 32. Nc3 Reb7 33. Rc1 Rb2 34. Rc2 Rxc2 35. Qxc2 Qa5 36. Nd1 Qe1+ 37. Kg2 h5 38. Rf2 hxg4 39. hxg4 Bd4 40. Rf1 Qh4 41. Qe2 Kg7 42. Rh1 Qg5 43. Kf3 Be5 44. Qe3 Qxe3+ 45. Nxe3 Rb2 46. Ng2 Rxa2 47. Nf4 Bxf4 48. Kxf4 a5 49. Rb1 a4 50. Rb6 a3 51. Rxc6 Ra1 52. e5 Rf1+ 53. Ke4 a2 54. Rc7+ Kf8 55. Ra7 f5+ 56. gxf5 gxf5+ 57. Kd5 a1=Q 58. Rxa1 Rxa1 59. Kxc5 f4 60. d4 f3 61. d5 f2 62. d6 f1=Q 0-1