Capablanca–Burn, San Sebastian 1911, a Ruy Lopez handled in the quiet, solid style Capablanca favoured in his early years. He annotated it himself in Chess Fundamentals (1921); the public-domain notes are below.
5.d3This is a very solid development, to which I was much addicted at the time, because of my ignorance of the multiple variations of the openings.
6…Be7In this variation there is the alternative of developing this Bishop via Kt 2, after P - K Kt 3.
11…Bc5Evidently to make room for the Queen at K 2, but I do not think the move advisable at this stage. B - K 3 is a more natural and effective move. It develops a piece and threatens B - B 5, which would have to be stopped.
12…Be6Now it is not so effective, because White's Q B is out, and the Knight, in going to K 3 to defend the square Q B 4, does not block the Q B.
14…Qe7This is bad. Black's game was already not good. He probably had no choice but to take the Knight with the Bishop before making this move.
16…Nb8In order to bring it to Q 2, to support the other Knight and also his King's Pawn. White, however, does not allow time for this, and by taking advantage of his superior position is able to win a Pawn.
17…b4Since he had no way to prevent the loss of a Pawn, he should have given it up where it is, and played Q Kt - Q 2, in order to make his position more solid. The text move not only loses a Pawn, but leaves Black's game very much weakened.
21…Kf8With a Pawn more and all his pieces ready for action, while Black is still backward in development, it only remains for White to drive home his advantage before Black can come out with his pieces.
22…Qh6This is practically forced. Black could not play P - Kt 3 because of B x P, and White meanwhile threatened Q - R 8 ch followed by Kt - B 5 ch and Q x P.
34…Ke7Black fights a hopeless battle. He is two Pawns down for all practical purposes, and the Pawns he has are isolated and have to be defended by pieces.
José Raúl Capablanca, Chess Fundamentals (1921) · Public domain · source