1.
d4
d5
2.
Nf3
e6
3.
e3
Bd6
4.
c4
c6
5.
Nc3
f5
6.
c5
Bc7
7.
b4
Nd7
8.
Bb2
Qe7
9.
Bd3
Nh6
10.
Qb3
e5
11.
dxe5
Nxe5
12.
Nxe5
Bxe5
13.
Ne2
Bc7
14.
Bd4
O-O
15.
h3
f4
16.
exf4
Rxf4
17.
O-O
Rf7
18.
Rae1
Qh4
19.
f4
Bf5
20.
Bxf5
Nxf5
21.
Bf2
Qh6
22.
Qf3
Raf8
23.
Rd1
Nh4
24.
Qg4
Ng6
25.
g3
Ne7
26.
Kg2
Nf5
27.
Nd4
Qf6
28.
Rfe1
Nxd4
29.
Bxd4
Qf5
30.
Qxf5
Rxf5
31.
Re7
R5f7
32.
Rde1
Bd8
33.
R7e6
Bf6
34.
Bxf6
Rxf6
35.
Re7
R6f7
36.
a3
g6
37.
R1e2
Kg7
38.
Kf3
Ra8
39.
Re8
Rxe8
40.
Rxe8
Rd7
41.
Ke3
Kf7
42.
Ra8
a6
43.
Kd3
Re7
44.
Rb8
Kf6
45.
Rf8+
Rf7
46.
Rxf7+
Kxf7
47.
g4
Ke7
48.
Ke3
Kd7
1/2-1/2
Opening Explorer
Explorer is loading.
Site
Hastings
Date
1895.??.??
Round
6
White
Gunsberg, Isidor
Black
Result
1/2-1/2
Notes by S. Tinsley.
- 4.c4 This form of the Queen's Pawn game has sometimes been denominated the Stonewall opening. For a purely defensive game (not much to White's taste however) P to B 3 has attractions, but obviously it shuts up B 3 for the Knight. That Piece, however (Q Kt), can be developed to Q 2, and perhaps, via B sq, to the King's side later. [Is it not the K B P which forms the Stonewall?—Ed.]
- 4…c6 Possibly P to Q Kt 3 is better at once. It gives the option of B to Kt 2, P to Q B 4, &c., later. The text move finds little favour. A similar opening, Tinsley v. Bird, was played on August 20.
- 5…f5 I do not remember seeing other recent games by Dr. Tarrasch in which this move was adopted by him. At any rate the policy of advancing the King's Bishop's Pawn at this stage is doubtful. The centre Pawn be it observed is left with only one defence already, and is frequently in such cases a source of weakness in the course of the after-play.
- 7…Nd7 There is a want of enterprise here. Admittedly White's P to B 5 is bad, and Black could well afford to commence at once some little attack on the weak Queen's side Pawns. P to Q R 4 seems loudly called for. P to Q Kt 3 could follow with effect.
- 9…Nh6 He can go back to B 2 with a view to the important move aimed at by Q to K 2, &c., viz. P to K 4. It is an exceptional case where Kt to R 3 in preference to B 3 is at least not bad, especially as White’s Queen’s Bishop is at Kt 2.
- 10.Qb3 A very strong move, with plenty of chances of a good sacrifice of the Knight presently by Kt x Q P, &c., after P to K 4 by Black, especially after White has Castled King's side, and perhaps played P to Q Kt 3 or 4.
- 17…Rf7 It does not appear that any profitable attack could be obtained by R to R 5, as White in certain cases replies B x R P, ch, &c., the Queen being free then for King's side defence.
- 25.g3 The safe accomplishment of the very desirable object of defending the real weakness on the King's side, the King's Bishop's Pawn, is really meritorious and secures a fairly equal game at once.
- 48…Kd7 Apparently the ending is dead even, and as each has a passed Pawn or as good, attempts to win on either side might be dangerous. We have pointed out that apparently Black’s true course was to attack early on the Queen’s side Pawns, and that there was opportunity for such attack, as no advantage could be gained on the King’s side, and several exchanges became necessary owing to the attempt on the King’s side. White was, as it turned out, left with a very good and creditable draw.
[Event "Hastings International Masters"] [Site "Hastings"] [Date "1895.??.??"] [Round "6"] [White "Gunsberg, Isidor"] [Black "Tarrasch, Siegbert"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] 1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 e6 3. e3 Bd6 4. c4 c6 5. Nc3 f5 6. c5 Bc7 7. b4 Nd7 8. Bb2 Qe7 9. Bd3 Nh6 10. Qb3 e5 11. dxe5 Nxe5 12. Nxe5 Bxe5 13. Ne2 Bc7 14. Bd4 O-O 15. h3 f4 16. exf4 Rxf4 17. O-O Rf7 18. Rae1 Qh4 19. f4 Bf5 20. Bxf5 Nxf5 21. Bf2 Qh6 22. Qf3 Raf8 23. Rd1 Nh4 24. Qg4 Ng6 25. g3 Ne7 26. Kg2 Nf5 27. Nd4 Qf6 28. Rfe1 Nxd4 29. Bxd4 Qf5 30. Qxf5 Rxf5 31. Re7 R5f7 32. Rde1 Bd8 33. R7e6 Bf6 34. Bxf6 Rxf6 35. Re7 R6f7 36. a3 g6 37. R1e2 Kg7 38. Kf3 Ra8 39. Re8 Rxe8 40. Rxe8 Rd7 41. Ke3 Kf7 42. Ra8 a6 43. Kd3 Re7 44. Rb8 Kf6 45. Rf8+ Rf7 46. Rxf7+ Kxf7 47. g4 Ke7 48. Ke3 Kd7 1/2-1/2