1.
d4
Nf6
2.
c4
e6
3.
Nf3
b6
4.
Bg5
h6
5.
Bxf6
Qxf6
6.
e4
Bb7
7.
Nc3
Bb4
8.
Qd3
Bxc3+
9.
bxc3
d6
10.
Qe3
Nd7
11.
Bd3
e5
12.
O-O
O-O
13.
a4
a5
14.
Ne1
Rae8
15.
f3
Qe6
16.
Nc2
exd4
17.
cxd4
f5
18.
d5
Qe5
19.
Qd4
Nc5
20.
Rfd1
fxe4
21.
fxe4
Nxd3
22.
Rxd3
Qxe4
0-1
Opening Explorer
Explorer is loading.
Site
Kristianstad
Date
1921.02.??
White
Hakansson, Arthur
Black
Result
0-1
We shall now give some examples which will illustrate the struggle between a defence which is trying to hold out in its position and an attacking force which is seeking to force a decision, and first one in which the defending party (in this case White) by one thoughtless move throws away all the trumps in his hand. Haakanson—Nimzowitsch. Played in 1921.
- 9…d6 And now after P-K4, the double complex we have been discussing will have arisen.
- 14.Ne1 White stood well, for it is improbable that Black would have been able to force him to a decision (i.e., to P-Q5), but the rather ponderous text-move creates difficulties in his own camp. His right course was 14. Kt-Q2 and P-KB3; his Q who is rather exposed at K3 would then have had a flight square at KB2, and nothing would have stood in the way of a further holding out in his formation.
- 15…Qe6 And now White ought to have eaten the bitter fruit, i.e., played P-Q5.
- 22…Qxe4 Lost a pawn and the game.
[Event "Match Nimzowitsch-Hakansson +4-1=3"] [Site "Kristianstad"] [Date "1921.02.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Hakansson, Arthur"] [Black "Nimzowitsch, Aron"] [Result "0-1"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. Bg5 h6 5. Bxf6 Qxf6 6. e4 Bb7 7. Nc3 Bb4 8. Qd3 Bxc3+ 9. bxc3 d6 10. Qe3 Nd7 11. Bd3 e5 12. O-O O-O 13. a4 a5 14. Ne1 Rae8 15. f3 Qe6 16. Nc2 exd4 17. cxd4 f5 18. d5 Qe5 19. Qd4 Nc5 20. Rfd1 fxe4 21. fxe4 Nxd3 22. Rxd3 Qxe4 0-1