1.
e4
e5
2.
Nc3
Nc6
3.
Bc4
d6
4.
d3
g6
5.
Nge2
Bg7
6.
O-O
Na5
7.
Bd5
Ne7
8.
f4
O-O
9.
a3
Nac6
10.
Ng3
Nxd5
11.
Nxd5
exf4
12.
Bxf4
Be6
13.
Qc1
Bxd5
14.
exd5
Ne7
15.
Bh6
Nxd5
16.
c4
Nb6
17.
Qf4
f5
18.
Rae1
Bxh6
19.
Qxh6
Qf6
20.
Rf3
Nd7
21.
Rfe3
Ne5
22.
h3
c5
23.
Rf1
Nf7
24.
Qf4
Rae8
25.
b3
Qc3
26.
Kh1
Rxe3
27.
Qxe3
Ne5
28.
Kh2
Qxb3
29.
Qg5
Qxd3
30.
Rf2
Nf7
31.
Qe7
Qd4
32.
Rf1
Qe5
33.
Qxb7
f4
34.
Ne4
Re8
35.
Re1
f3+
36.
Kg1
Qd4+
37.
Kf1
Qxc4+
38.
Kf2
Qc2+
39.
Kxf3
Rxe4
0-1
Opening Explorer
Explorer is loading.
Site
Hastings
Date
1895.??.??
Round
14
White
Black
Walbrodt, Carl August
Result
0-1
Notes by R. Teichmann.
- 4…g6 This treatment of the defence in the Vienna game cannot be recommended. White must, after opening the King's Bishop's file by P to K B 4, get a very strong attack on the weak Black King's Bishop's Pawn.
- 6.O-O He ought to have played P to Q R 3 in order to preserve the King's Bishop.
- 12…Be6 If B x P; 13. B to R 6 (!), B to Kt 2 (best); 14. B x B, and White has good prospects of a strong attack.
- 13.Qc1 Kt to B 3 appears to be much better.
- 15.Bh6 Unintelligible. I do not see the slightest prospect of a compensating attack for the loss of this valuable Pawn.
- 22…c5 Black has played very well, and has established an absolutely unassailable position; winning can now only be a question of time.
[Event "Hastings International Masters"] [Site "Hastings"] [Date "1895.??.??"] [Round "14"] [White "Mieses, Jacques"] [Black "Walbrodt, Carl August"] [Result "0-1"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. Bc4 d6 4. d3 g6 5. Nge2 Bg7 6. O-O Na5 7. Bd5 Ne7 8. f4 O-O 9. a3 Nac6 10. Ng3 Nxd5 11. Nxd5 exf4 12. Bxf4 Be6 13. Qc1 Bxd5 14. exd5 Ne7 15. Bh6 Nxd5 16. c4 Nb6 17. Qf4 f5 18. Rae1 Bxh6 19. Qxh6 Qf6 20. Rf3 Nd7 21. Rfe3 Ne5 22. h3 c5 23. Rf1 Nf7 24. Qf4 Rae8 25. b3 Qc3 26. Kh1 Rxe3 27. Qxe3 Ne5 28. Kh2 Qxb3 29. Qg5 Qxd3 30. Rf2 Nf7 31. Qe7 Qd4 32. Rf1 Qe5 33. Qxb7 f4 34. Ne4 Re8 35. Re1 f3+ 36. Kg1 Qd4+ 37. Kf1 Qxc4+ 38. Kf2 Qc2+ 39. Kxf3 Rxe4 0-1