1.
e4
e5
2.
Nf3
Nc6
3.
Bb5
a6
4.
Ba4
d6
5.
O-O
Nf6
6.
c3
Bd7
7.
d4
Be7
8.
Re1
O-O
9.
Nbd2
Re8
10.
Nf1
exd4
11.
Nxd4
Nxd4
12.
Qxd4
Bxa4
13.
Qxa4
d5
14.
exd5
Qxd5
15.
Bf4
c6
16.
Re5
Qd3
17.
Rd1
Qg6
18.
Ne3
Bf8
19.
Qb3
b5
20.
h3
Ne4
21.
Qc2
Rxe5
22.
Bxe5
Re8
23.
Bf4
Qf6
24.
Bc7
Bc5
25.
Rd8
Rxd8
26.
Bxd8
Qe6
27.
Qd3
f5
28.
b3
f4
29.
Nd1
Nxf2
30.
Nxf2
Qe1+
31.
Kh2
Bxf2
32.
h4
h5
0-1
Opening Explorer
Explorer is loading.
Site
Hastings
Date
1895.??.??
Round
21
White
Walbrodt, Carl August
Black
Result
0-1
Notes by I. Gunsberg.
- 4…d6 In the game Lasker v. Steinitz, we have given our opinion about this defence, and the fact that Black is successful in this instance does not induce us to alter our views. His success may be attributed to a vigorous effort at a counter-attack, such as we think the second player in the Ruy Lopez is bound to make whenever he resorts to the close defence of P to Q 3 or P to K Kt 3.
- 5…Nf6 This move is, we think, preferable to the move of Kt to K 2, played by Steinitz against Lasker, as Black can Castle one move earlier.
- 6…Bd7 If Black had taken the King's Pawn, White need not necessarily have played for its recovery at once by B x Kt, ch, followed by Q to R 4. He could have played with greater advantage 7. P to Q 4.
- 10…exd4 Elsewhere, in expressing our disbelief in the efficacy of the manoeuvre of the Queen's Knight, we expressed our opinion that at the time when this Knight plays to B sq, then Black should adopt a vigorous policy beginning with P x P, and not wait till White has completed his tardy developing moves. The success achieved by Black in this instance fully bears out our views.
- 13…d5 Black is fortunate in having obtained the opportunity, which he seizes at the right moment, to free his Bishop, always so inconveniently blocked in as a result of the P to Q 3 defence.
- 20…Ne4 With this excellent move Black succeeds in counteracting the effect produced by White's vigorous handling of his Rooks.
- 23…Qf6 Black cleverly utilises the awkward position of White's Queen's Bishop, in order to get up an attack on White's King's Bishop's Pawn.
- 25.Rd8 The only other way to prevent Kt x B P, which was threatened, was by Kt to Kt 4, but that hardly forms a lasting remedy, as the Knight would be subject to attack by Black's Pawns.
- 26…Qe6 This move keeps up the attack, Kt x B P being again threatened.
- 27…f5 More vigorous play, and again threatening Kt x B P, followed by P to B 5.
- 28.b3 Black's intention to play P to B 5 was so obvious that it is surprising White did not play B to B 7 to prevent that.
- 28…f4 Though Black might have played Kt x K B P at once, yet this move is better still, as it forces the game.
- 31…Bxf2 And mate soon follows. The way Black obtained the mastery over White is very instructive, and there is a pretty neatness about the last few moves which, combined with Black's virile handling of the opening after White's move of Kt to B sq, makes this game a most refreshing and at the same time eloquent contrast to the game produced by the strategy of concentrating towards the rear, employed by Steinitz in his game against Lasker played with the same opening.
[Event "Hastings International Masters"] [Site "Hastings"] [Date "1895.??.??"] [Round "21"] [White "Walbrodt, Carl August"] [Black "Steinitz, William"] [Result "0-1"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 d6 5. O-O Nf6 6. c3 Bd7 7. d4 Be7 8. Re1 O-O 9. Nbd2 Re8 10. Nf1 exd4 11. Nxd4 Nxd4 12. Qxd4 Bxa4 13. Qxa4 d5 14. exd5 Qxd5 15. Bf4 c6 16. Re5 Qd3 17. Rd1 Qg6 18. Ne3 Bf8 19. Qb3 b5 20. h3 Ne4 21. Qc2 Rxe5 22. Bxe5 Re8 23. Bf4 Qf6 24. Bc7 Bc5 25. Rd8 Rxd8 26. Bxd8 Qe6 27. Qd3 f5 28. b3 f4 29. Nd1 Nxf2 30. Nxf2 Qe1+ 31. Kh2 Bxf2 32. h4 h5 0-1