1.
d4
d5
2.
Nf3
Nf6
3.
c4
e6
4.
Bg5
Be7
5.
Nc3
Nbd7
6.
e3
O-O
7.
Rc1
b6
8.
cxd5
exd5
9.
Bb5
Bb7
10.
O-O
a6
11.
Ba4
Rc8
12.
Qe2
c5
13.
dxc5
Nxc5
14.
Rfd1
Nxa4
15.
Nxa4
b5
16.
Rxc8
Qxc8
17.
Nc3
Qc4
18.
Nd4
Qxe2
19.
Ncxe2
Rc8
20.
Nf5
Kf8
21.
Nxe7
Kxe7
22.
Nd4
g6
23.
f3
h6
24.
Bxh6
Nd7
25.
h4
Nc5
26.
Bf4
Ne6
27.
Nxe6
Kxe6
28.
Rd2
Rh8
29.
Rc2
Rc8
30.
Rxc8
Bxc8
31.
Kf2
d4
32.
exd4
Kd5
33.
Ke3
Be6
34.
Kd3
Kc6
35.
a3
Bc4+
36.
Ke3
Be6
37.
Bh6
Kd5
38.
Bg7
1-0
Opening Explorer
Explorer is loading.
Site
Berlin
Date
1913.11.21
Round
2
White
Black
Result
1-0
Capablanca–Teichmann, Berlin 1913, a model Queen's Gambit Declined in which White isolates Black's queen's pawn and converts the resulting endgame with great precision against one of the finest players in the world. Capablanca's public-domain notes from Chess Fundamentals (1921) follow.
- 9.Bb5 An invention of my own, I believe. I played it on the spur of the moment simply to change the normal course of the game. Generally the Bishop goes to Q 3, or to R 6, after Q - R 4. The text move is in the nature of an ordinary developing move, and as it violates no principle it cannot be bad.
- 13…Nxc5 If P x P; K R - Q 1, and White would play to win one of Black's centre Pawns. The drawback to the text move is that it leaves Black's Q P isolated, and consequently weak and subject to attack.
- 17…Qc4 Black aims at the exchange of Queens in order to remain with two Bishops for the ending, but in this position such a course is a mistake, because the Bishop at Kt 2 is inactive and cannot come into the game by any means, unless Black gives up the isolated Queen's Pawn which the Bishop must defend.
- 19.Ncxe2 Notice the co-ordination of the Knights' moves. They are manoeuvred chain-like, so to speak, in order to maintain one of them, either at Q 4 or ready to go there. Now White threatens to take the open file, and therefore forces Black's next move.
- 19…Rc8 The student should examine this position carefully. There seems to be no particular danger, yet, as White will demonstrate, Black may be said to be lost. Indeed, I must confess that I can see no adequate defence against White's next move.
- 20.Nf5 If 20...B - Q 1; 21 Kt - Q 6, R - B 2; 22 Kt x B, R x Kt; 23 B x Kt, B x B; 24 R x P, R - B 2; 25 R - Q 2, and White is a Pawn ahead. If 20...B moves anywhere else, then B x Kt, doubling the K B P and isolating all of Black's King's side Pawns.
- 22…g6 This is practically forced, as White threatened Kt - B 5 ch. Notice that the Black Knight is pinned in such a way that no relief can be afforded except by giving up the K R P or abandoning the open file with the Rook, which would be disastrous.
- 26…Ne6 Black exchanges Knights to remain with Bishops of opposite colours, which gives him the best chance to draw.
- 31…d4 Practically forced. Otherwise the White King would march up to Q 4 and then to B 5 and win Black's Queen's side Pawns. If Black attempted to stop this by putting his King at Q B 3 then the White King would enter through K 5 into Black's King's side and win just as easily.
- 38.Bg7 The student ought to have realised by this time the enormous importance of playing well every kind of ending. In this game again, practically from the opening, White aimed at nothing but the isolation of Black's Q P. Then by accurate playing in the ending he gradually forced home his advantage.
[Event "Match Capablanca-Teichmann +2-0=0"] [Site "Berlin"] [Date "1913.11.21"] [Round "2"] [White "Capablanca, Jose Raul"] [Black "Teichmann, Richard"] [Result "1-0"] 1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. c4 e6 4. Bg5 Be7 5. Nc3 Nbd7 6. e3 O-O 7. Rc1 b6 8. cxd5 exd5 9. Bb5 Bb7 10. O-O a6 11. Ba4 Rc8 12. Qe2 c5 13. dxc5 Nxc5 14. Rfd1 Nxa4 15. Nxa4 b5 16. Rxc8 Qxc8 17. Nc3 Qc4 18. Nd4 Qxe2 19. Ncxe2 Rc8 20. Nf5 Kf8 21. Nxe7 Kxe7 22. Nd4 g6 23. f3 h6 24. Bxh6 Nd7 25. h4 Nc5 26. Bf4 Ne6 27. Nxe6 Kxe6 28. Rd2 Rh8 29. Rc2 Rc8 30. Rxc8 Bxc8 31. Kf2 d4 32. exd4 Kd5 33. Ke3 Be6 34. Kd3 Kc6 35. a3 Bc4+ 36. Ke3 Be6 37. Bh6 Kd5 38. Bg7 1-0